<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Omniture Buying Visual Sciences for $394 Million</title>
	<link>http://www.webconnoisseur.com/blog/analytics/omniture-buying-visual-sciences-for-394-million/</link>
	<description>Dustin Woodard's thoughts on search, web analytics and the web in general.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.webconnoisseur.com/blog/analytics/omniture-buying-visual-sciences-for-394-million/#comment-13850</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webconnoisseur.com/blog/analytics/omniture-buying-visual-sciences-for-394-million/#comment-13850</guid>
					<description>Monopoly? What about Google, WebTrends, CoreMetrics, ClickTracks, etc? True, Omniture and Visual Sciences are the bigger players in the Enterprise client space, but there are a lot of options in the SMB space and Omniture and VS will have a hard time scaling back their offerings to really compete in that market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monopoly? What about Google, WebTrends, CoreMetrics, ClickTracks, etc? True, Omniture and Visual Sciences are the bigger players in the Enterprise client space, but there are a lot of options in the SMB space and Omniture and VS will have a hard time scaling back their offerings to really compete in that market.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
