<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Actual Top 10 Search Terms of 2006</title>
	<link>http://www.webconnoisseur.com/blog/seo/actual-top-10-search-terms-of-2006/</link>
	<description>Dustin Woodard's thoughts on search, web analytics and the web in general.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Suresh Chowhan</title>
		<link>http://www.webconnoisseur.com/blog/seo/actual-top-10-search-terms-of-2006/#comment-1177</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webconnoisseur.com/blog/seo/actual-top-10-search-terms-of-2006/#comment-1177</guid>
					<description>realy good analysis. many posting on different websites tell the top search terms. but your this analysis is absolutely actual</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>realy good analysis. many posting on different websites tell the top search terms. but your this analysis is absolutely actual
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.webconnoisseur.com/blog/seo/actual-top-10-search-terms-of-2006/#comment-101</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webconnoisseur.com/blog/seo/actual-top-10-search-terms-of-2006/#comment-101</guid>
					<description>Great research, Dustin.  Wise counsel to "never overestimate the intelligence of people".  It never ceases to amaze me when I want to show somebody something on the Web and this happens:

ME: "Hey, go check out Digg.com.  I want to show you something cool."
USER: "How do you spell that?"
ME: "D-I-G-G... dot com."
USER: "OK." (goes to Google and searches for Digg.com)
ME: "What are you doing?"
USER: "I'm going to Digg.com."
ME: "Why don't you just type Digg.com in the address bar?"
USER: "You can do that?"

Silly as it sounds, I am NOT making this up.  It's a wonder some people can use the Web at all.  Sobering for those of us who try to create usable websites...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great research, Dustin.  Wise counsel to &#8220;never overestimate the intelligence of people&#8221;.  It never ceases to amaze me when I want to show somebody something on the Web and this happens:</p>
<p>ME: &#8220;Hey, go check out Digg.com.  I want to show you something cool.&#8221;<br />
USER: &#8220;How do you spell that?&#8221;<br />
ME: &#8220;D-I-G-G&#8230; dot com.&#8221;<br />
USER: &#8220;OK.&#8221; (goes to Google and searches for Digg.com)<br />
ME: &#8220;What are you doing?&#8221;<br />
USER: &#8220;I&#8217;m going to Digg.com.&#8221;<br />
ME: &#8220;Why don&#8217;t you just type Digg.com in the address bar?&#8221;<br />
USER: &#8220;You can do that?&#8221;</p>
<p>Silly as it sounds, I am NOT making this up.  It&#8217;s a wonder some people can use the Web at all.  Sobering for those of us who try to create usable websites&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SearchLvr</title>
		<link>http://www.webconnoisseur.com/blog/seo/actual-top-10-search-terms-of-2006/#comment-100</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webconnoisseur.com/blog/seo/actual-top-10-search-terms-of-2006/#comment-100</guid>
					<description>I love it. No wonder they don't share the data! One of our most popular search terms is for another search engine... not very good PR, is it?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it. No wonder they don&#8217;t share the data! One of our most popular search terms is for another search engine&#8230; not very good PR, is it?????
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason R.</title>
		<link>http://www.webconnoisseur.com/blog/seo/actual-top-10-search-terms-of-2006/#comment-99</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webconnoisseur.com/blog/seo/actual-top-10-search-terms-of-2006/#comment-99</guid>
					<description>Great work Dustin. Very interesting. Hopefully next year they will provide unfiltered data as Danny S. suggests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work Dustin. Very interesting. Hopefully next year they will provide unfiltered data as Danny S. suggests.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
